Work Health Authority v Kawasaki Heavy Industries
2020
The charge failed to articulate the risk to which the worker was exposed to allow the Defendant to understand the basis of the charge. The charge did not articulate over what time or upon what date the breach of duty is supposed to have occurred. It is not possible to identify whether the breach was one act or omission or a series of acts or omissions leading up to 29 November 2017. The charge was defective and without extensive amendment was a nullity. Leave to amend the charge was refused as the proposed amendments change the offence from a singular date to a period of time and the particulars do not link an alleged failure of KHI to that period of time. The proposed amendments were considered to be the laying of a new charge outside the statute of limitations.